Re: [photo-3d] Next Step From A Realist?

["don lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The de Wijs lnses with a focal length of  45 mm are poor lenses to check the
grain structure of film with to put it mildly Don!!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Kersenbrock" <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2000 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Next Step From A Realist?


> don lopp wrote:
> >
> > I dont understand how people are able to discuss MF when they apparently
> > have not actually viewed it . When properly done, it is a bit different.
> > Like the first time I showed MF to my wife she said every thing looked
> > smooth as reguards to the transition from near to far where as 35mm
looks
> > like little models on a stage. As I have said before, my (flat) photo
>
> Sounds like the 35mm photos were taken "hyper" (lens spacing too far).
>
> Mike K.
>
> P.S. - What 35mm have your friends seen?  Have they been
>        shown something properly representative of 35mm can do!  Using
>        a realist isn't the "ultimate" 35mm where MF is the next step,
>        as suggested perhaps by the subject line....
>        that'd almost be like saying the Sputnik is the ultimate MF camera,
>        and judging by the MF group, I don't think that's your position.
:-)
>        Ask Dr.-T about his using a de Wijs Comby to look at Provia 100F
images
>        taken in his S1.
>
>
>
>