Re: [photo-3d] Next Step From A Realist?

[Mike Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't understand your comment, could you expand
on it a bit?

Mike K.

P.S. - Personally, I've the 50mm lenses in my de Wijs Comby,
       and images looks magnificent!  I also use Provia 100F
       (as I mentioned) in both 120 and 35mm formats, and in
       both formats it's nearly grain free. My other de Wijs
       has 60mm lenses in them I think, and they make slides
       look magnificent as well.



don lopp wrote:
> 
> The de Wijs lnses with a focal length of  45 mm are poor lenses to check the
> grain structure of film with to put it mildly Don!!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Kersenbrock" <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2000 4:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Next Step From A Realist?
> 
> > don lopp wrote:
> > >
> > > I dont understand how people are able to discuss MF when they apparently
> > > have not actually viewed it . When properly done, it is a bit different.
> > > Like the first time I showed MF to my wife she said every thing looked
> > > smooth as reguards to the transition from near to far where as 35mm
> looks
> > > like little models on a stage. As I have said before, my (flat) photo
> >
> > Sounds like the 35mm photos were taken "hyper" (lens spacing too far).
> >
> > Mike K.
> >
> > P.S. - What 35mm have your friends seen?  Have they been
> >        shown something properly representative of 35mm can do!  Using
> >        a realist isn't the "ultimate" 35mm where MF is the next step,
> >        as suggested perhaps by the subject line....
> >        that'd almost be like saying the Sputnik is the ultimate MF camera,
> >        and judging by the MF group, I don't think that's your position.
> :-)
> >        Ask Dr.-T about his using a de Wijs Comby to look at Provia 100F
> images
> >        taken in his S1.
> >
> >
> >
> >