Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[photo-3d] again those figures!!!


  • From: "Sergio Baldissara" <winter@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [photo-3d] again those figures!!!
  • Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:54:36 +0200

2.5mm as an absuloute figure is meaningless.
it can be ok on 9cm horizontal lenght (6x9 frame), may be too much on 6cm
(6x6 frame)...
I repeat maximinum (not optimal) separation is about 1/30th of horizontal
lenght (say about 2° parallax). I you can't believe it, just crop a
particular from an anaglyph: you'll realize you can't fuse any more!
----- Original Message -----
From: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>    From: Greg Erker <erker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Re: Camera separation in stereo photography
>
> >I think I know of one difference in measuring deviation
>I cosider that
when
> >one talks of  a deviation o2.5 this means a 2.5mm deviation osomething
that