Re: [photo-3d] again those figures!!!

[Greg Erker <erker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>2.5mm as an absuloute figure is meaningless.
>it can be ok on 9cm horizontal lenght (6x9 frame), may be too much on 6cm
>(6x6 frame)...
>I repeat maximinum (not optimal) separation is about 1/30th of horizontal
>lenght (say about 2° parallax). I you can't believe it, just crop a
>particular from an anaglyph: you'll realize you can't fuse any more!

  Don and I are talking about 6x6 MF
stereo images. Sorry if it wasn't
clear.

  I agree that angular deviation is
what is relevant but it is easier
to measure linear deviation from your
film chips (assuming we understand
what viewing FL is being used).

  What does "I you can't believe it,
just crop a particular from an anaglyph:
you'll realize you can't fuse any more!"
mean?  I don't understand.

Thanks - Greg E.