Re: [photo-3d] C.G. vs. real (was: Re: Digest Number 286)

[Herbert C Maxey <bmaxey1@xxxxxxxx>]

>>It's not a silly question.  At a recent Third Friday Stereo Dinner
>>John Billingham had a really cool stereo pair of an airline model
>>model sitting in front of a computer with an image of clouds on the
>>screen.  What was really cool was that the on screen image of clouds
>>had depth.  He shot the pair on a slide bar and altered the on screen
>>image between shots.
>> 
>>If the rules don't allow computer imagery would that pair be
>>acceptable?  If not why not?  Remember that it was shot with a film
>>camera and the main subjects were real (computer and model

What if, What if, What if....... Certainly I should think it would be
allowed. Seems to me that it is still a photograph - just because part of
it is contains part of the image on displayed on a computer monitir, I
see no problem. But to reiterate, we were originally talking about
computer generated images Vs. Photographic Images. 

I would guess that many of the Stereocards out there were manipulated to
some extent, but here aghain, that is not what started this argument. it
was COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGES VS PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES.

Bob