Re: [photo-3d] MF vs. 35mm stereo

[Mike Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

pd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I think that like everything else, it's a trade-off among price,
> convenience and quality.  If MF cameras, film, processing and viewers
> are scarce and/or expensive, any of those would be a "barrier" to
> entry.
> 
> Personally, all this talk is making me think about trying to find a
> Sputnik.

And when you see its viewer (among other things), you'll understand
further about why folk don't use MF "everyday" and prefer the 
"inferior" RBTs. 

:-)

Mike K.

P.S. - Yes, I've 1.9 Sputniks (backup one's a bit "weak").  I loved
       the MF Expo, but for every-day use, we need an RBT MF camera
       (twin'ed new Rollei's?), and practical MF 3D projection in the
       same mounts used in viewers.