Re: [photo-3d] MF vs. 35mm stereo

[pd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Dr. George A. Themelis writes:
> > There is no comparison between 35mm and MF. Everything that is 
> > good in 35mm is better in MF - sharpness (lack of grain), 
> > tonality, size, "immersiveness", etc. The step up to MF is 
> > significant. 
> 
> I guess then the next question to ask is this:  "Since MF
> is so much better than 35mm, why doen't every one and
> they uncle jump into MF stereo?"

I think that like everything else, it's a trade-off among price,
convenience and quality.  If MF cameras, film, processing and viewers
are scarce and/or expensive, any of those would be a "barrier" to
entry.

Personally, all this talk is making me think about trying to find a
Sputnik.

-pd


-- 
--------
                             Peter Davis
               Funny stuff at http://www.pfdstudio.com
                 The artwork formerly shown as prints
    List of resources for children's writers and illustrators at:
                  http://www.pfdstudio.com/cwrl.html