Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] Re: Medium format viewer
- From: "Don Lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Re: Medium format viewer
- Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 17:36:53 -0800
NO DON
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nielsen" <nielsnielsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Photo-3D" <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 6:40 AM
Subject: [photo-3d] Re: Medium format viewer
> Hello, Paul, and friends;
> Thanks for the tips.
>
> I tried to subscribe to the MF3D, but my subscription is
> still pendind.
>
> >Well, I've covered a lot already, so I'll stop for now.
> Niels, what
> >is your experience level with other forms of 3D
> photography?
>
>
> Yes, you have really covered a lot.
> I have a little bit of experience with 35mm stereo slides.
> As I don't want to buy a stereo camera (I don't think it is
> worth the expense), I chose to do it with 35mm cameras, with
> the advantage of varying the stereo base. I view the slides
> with two inexpensive slide viewers attatched... rudimentar,
> but nice.
> My interest in MF slides, is not only because of their
> brilliance, but also because of the higher image
> size.
>
> I've heard of a viewing lens that is made of a triplet
> behind a convergent lens that is capable of 10x
> magnifications... I haven't seen one of those yet, but I
> think that there will be a *lot* of distortion with a 6x6
> slide... unless this lens has the right focal lenght ...
> now... will such (80mm - the "right" FL for MF) lens be
> capable of a 10x magnification?
>
> Another point: will I loose too much by using a shorter
> lens, in order to have a higher magnification?
>
> Thanks again
> Niels
>
>
>
>
>
>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|