Re: [photo-3d] Anaglyph Aerials

["John A. Rupkalvis" <stereoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabriel Jacob" <3-d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 8:00 PM
Subject: [photo-3d] Anaglyph Aerials


> ...well I've just uploaded some new
> new declassified images at the following web site,
> http://www.geocities.com/gabriel3d/geocities.html
>
> Gabriel

These look great!  I especially liked the one of the San Bruno mountain
range.  Did you compose that when you shot it, or did you crop it later?
The composition works well in all three axes.   Purists might be bothered
that technically the lower right corner violates the stereo window, but it
doesn't bother me at all, since it is an homogenous inanimate subject.

I feel that the importance of observing the stereo window rules is relative
to the subject matter.  Stereoscopic imaging is very subjective, and I find
this to be an excellent example.  If the entire image had been pushed behind
the window, the horizon topography would have had too wide a parallax
separation.  The image as it is composed is, I feel, the optimum for the
subject.

I am wondering what some others think about this.   Comments from anyone
else?

JR


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/