[photo-3d] Subjective Windows

[matmail2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

--- In photo-3d@xxxx, "John A. Rupkalvis" <stereoscope@xxxx> wrote:
> 
> I feel that the importance of observing the stereo window rules is 
>relative to the subject matter...  If the entire image had been 
>pushed behind the window, the horizon topography would have had too 
wide a parallax separation. 

I agree, and further think that the importance of observing stereo 
window rules also depends on the type of stereo image being 
presented.  IMHO it can be a mistake to create an anaglyph with 
everything behind the window, since distant objects can ghost 
terribly due to excessive deviation between the red and blue/green 
channels.  Anaglyphs are often much more effective if the channels 
converge in the middle of the depth range, with equal, smaller 
amounts of deviation close up and far away.  This is especially true 
with printed anaglyphs - you can get away with a lot more separation 
on computer monitors.  The same issues might also apply to Stereojet 
prints, but I don't yet have the budget to prove it.  Jim Harp


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/