Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Computer Compositing


  • From: T3D Bill Stratemeyer <wwstrat@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Computer Compositing
  • Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 22:08:20 -0500

john bercovitz wrote:
> Bill Stratemeyer writes:
> 
> > I have uploaded a modified deviation test called devt.jpg
> [...]
> > Please take a look comments and suggestions are welcome
> 
> There's too little difference there for me to see any distortions.
> Sometimes I think I can imagine that one end or another of the
> brick (rectangular parallelpiped 8-) is larger or smaller than the
> other end of the same brick but it could be just my imagination.
> The thing is, I _know_ it's a brick and it's hard to clear my
> preconceptions.
> 
> One comment is that in a crosseyed view, you get keystoning for
> sure.  So it's better to have infinity at 65 mm separation if you
> can view it like that.

  I will redo a new test with more parallax.  And set the infinity
spacing to 65 mm.  Maybe now just 2 objects one wire frame and one
solid.  Say the Brick, both objects in the same orientation viewed
square on and several degrees above. Or would it be preferable to 
modify the "rectangular parallelpiped 8-)" object so that there are 
no right angles.
   
 Thanks 
Bill Strat....


------------------------------

End of TECH3D Digest 43
***********************