Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: relation between squash and separation


  • From: T3D john bercovitz <bercov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: relation between squash and separation
  • Date: Sat, 5 Apr 1997 11:03:29 -0800

You can ftp bobcat.etsu.edu and then
cd pub/photo/photo-3d/technical where you can pick up
orthomag.gif, orthosep.gif, and pepax.gif.  (They're binaries)
If you have any questions after looking over those diagrams,
just give me a shout.

> I guess that's what you are suggesting, except the situation
> that we call "squash" is a result of the taking/viewing
> combination and not built into the pair during taking (as the
> "squash" suggests).

Wonderful observation, George.  I don't think that's been
said before.  Also, good short answer that stretch/squash
and hypo/hyper are qualitatively different effects and
non-compensating.

John B


------------------------------