Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: relation between squash and separation
- From: T3D john bercovitz <bercov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: relation between squash and separation
- Date: Sat, 5 Apr 1997 11:03:29 -0800
You can ftp bobcat.etsu.edu and then
cd pub/photo/photo-3d/technical where you can pick up
orthomag.gif, orthosep.gif, and pepax.gif. (They're binaries)
If you have any questions after looking over those diagrams,
just give me a shout.
> I guess that's what you are suggesting, except the situation
> that we call "squash" is a result of the taking/viewing
> combination and not built into the pair during taking (as the
> "squash" suggests).
Wonderful observation, George. I don't think that's been
said before. Also, good short answer that stretch/squash
and hypo/hyper are qualitatively different effects and
non-compensating.
John B
------------------------------
|