Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

T3D Re: T3D Re: T3D Re: digital camera resolution


  • From: bercov@xxxxxxxxxxx (John Bercovitz)
  • Subject: T3D Re: T3D Re: T3D Re: digital camera resolution
  • Date: Tue, 27 Jan 98 19:41:01 PST

> The Nyquist rules requires more than 2 pixels per line, to be precise.

Oops!  Can you tell us more about how that works?  I had heard
that you had to have one column of pixels for the black line and
an adjacent column for the white line.  I suppose that's only
if you have perfect registration between the lines on the test
target and the columns on the CCD.

> Dollar for dollar, I believe that scanning a 35 mm negative is the most
> cost effective means of achieving resolution.

I agree.  But who knows how fast this field will progress?

> I think Bill was saying that the digital cameras are good enough to be
> real players in some niches.  I agree.

My niche for it is for web pages showing our work progress.  It's
really perfect for that.  Gives me the right number of pixels and
more to spare, not a really excessive number of pixels which you
would get from 35 mm.

John B

Happy birthday to Mozart.  If he had only lived, 
he would have been 242 years old today.


------------------------------