|
This message is to all of those who,
have at one time or other, relished the thought of burning Kodak at the
proverbial stake for this emulsion-pinhole fiasco. I know that while my choice
of language here may be considered strong by some, I feel that it is absolutely
justified in light of the problem and how Kodak has handled it thus far. I shoot
both 35mm and 4x5 sheet film; the 35 film has never given me any trouble at all,
but my 4x5 work has been haunted often by the pinhole plague. I have pulled each
and every trick in the book to shake this problem, always I wear latex gloves,
handle the film as I would a snowflake, use only distilled water for all
solutions, a water stop bath, different developers- everything. Sometimes I get
lucky and shoot a neg that has very little problems with it, but more often
there is something due to a defect in manufacturing that requires retouching.
For those of you who also shoot the sheet film, you well know that for the price
one must pay for this film, and for the time and skill involved in crafting
images with this this format, it is entirely UNacceptable to put up with this
nuisance.
My question to
anyone out there is this: has anyone out there been successful in getting a
replacement box of film from Kodak when they get a typical batch of pinholed
emulsion?? How big of a production was it to convince Kodak that it was their
fault, and not the fault of processing or handling??
Any light shone
upon this puzzle would be graciously recieved.
Kindest regards to all,
Clark aka The Great Canadian Beaver
Trap Theif
|