Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Konica IR ...!st time, hyperfocal focusing, and Stigmata
- From: Eckhard Stephan <eckhard.stephan@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Konica IR ...!st time, hyperfocal focusing, and Stigmata
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 13:46:16 +0100
"Christina Z. Anderson" wrote:
>
> Therefore, if I focussed not close enough (i.e. not on the infrared mark on
> the camera lens which is a bit closer of a focus than the usual focus mark
> on a lens) the foreground might be more blurred and the background
> sharper....?
Of course you're right, I just tried to imagine what might happen if you
focused too close...
You are right that the whole image being softened probably
> indicates something different, as it should be sharp somewhere in the image
> if it is a hyperfocal problem....whatever the case may be, maybe if I
> tripodded or didn't blow up the image to 11 by 14....maybe I am too used to
> sharpness from 4 by 5 and Tmax and the Konica is just less sharp (?)
Definitely not. I got some VERY sharp Konica IR pics, 135mm enlarged to
16x20 inch (40x50 cm)...;-)) I think the problem is that you didn't use
a tripod. Personally I found it almost impossible to do handheld shots
on Konica IR...
Do you
> use the infrared focusing mark on the lens with Konica or maybe Konica does
> not require that and just Kodak does?
As usual, different people, different experiences... It depends on your
equipment: Normal or apochromatic lens? For which wavelenghts does the
focussing mark apply? etc... With HIE, I do not use focus corrections
with a Wratten #25, just small apertures. I do however focus according
to the infrared mark with my Wratten #87 opaque filter.
Konica ? I'm just running a test series with tele lenses at large
apertures (3,5; 4,5)... To be honest, I still haven't found the ideal
solution. Focussing according to what I see isn't enough, half way
between the normal and the ir focussing mark is already a little bit too
much... As long as conditions permit small apertures, focussing isn't a
problem at all. Hope that helps,
Eckhard
--
========================================
* Eckhard Stephan *
* Freiburg (Germany) *
* eckhard.stephan@xxxxxxxx *
* http://www.eckhards-photobox.de *
========================================
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|