Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[MF3D.FORUM:810] Re: Deviation


  • From: "don lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:810] Re: Deviation
  • Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 13:46:58 -0700

To date I have not seen any Decent viewers for viewing 2 x 2 stereo
slides-by decent I mean close to Being Ortho with decent illumination.Don
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Kersenbrock" <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 10:03 PM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:801] Re: Deviation


> don lopp wrote:
> >
> > If you gobutt to butt you then end up with Realist format ,Don.
>
> You could, but one also could end up with 2x2 stereo format with
> a "vertical" aspect ratio (which works fine in some viewers).
>
> Mike K.
>
>
> > > > I am surprised to read that one can use twin SLRs with 60 to 100 mm
> > > > separation-I wish it were possible Don
> > >
> > > They can get pretty close butt-to-butt can't they?
> > >
> > > Mike K.
> > >
>