Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: How do you make a panorama Photo?
- From: Jeff Foster <jncfoster@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: How do you make a panorama Photo?
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:24:18 -0800
I've been lurking on this list for quite some time now, so please pardon me
if I'm "butting-in" here...
I'm currently wresting with this concept myself, after investigating several
"1-shot" reflective solutions vs. stitching 35mm shots with a 14mm lens.
I've even tried a Seitz Roundshot 35/35 - which I recently sold on eBay.
My observations so far are (not conclusions):
- Quality input data for high-res VRs can only come from multiple-shot panos
that gets stitched (provided you are using a proper pano-rig with your
camera) - even if you're shooting digital.
- Large format Roundshots and century-old swing-lens solutions take
beautiful panos with rich quality, but cost an "arm and a leg". Quite
possibly overkill if you're simply creating QTVRs. There is no doubt that
the best quality results come from these monsters, but cost and
development/scanning time may be prohibitive for most.
- Reflective one-shot solutions are great for live video (ie. BeHere) or
quick digital "donuts" for web-deliverd VRs, but I haven't seen any quality
shots taken with one yet... at least that I'd want to blow-up and print
from. Oh... and then there's the "arm and a leg" factor again (+ possible
first-born)
- For QTVRs new "cubic" format, requiring only 6 shots, perhaps this is a
step in the right direction for quicker stitched VRs that give full 360x360
views...? Set up is still a hassle but the price is right!
Again... these are only my observations thus far - too soon to make any
conclusions - nor is the industry slowing down in development of these
media-rich technologies. Heck, I'm still struggling with "film vs. digital"
- and when do I use which one!
I'm also currently experimenting with "hyper-stereo" setups and
investigating the 360 stereo space... very exciting and visually
captivating!
Thanks to all for a lively discussion and your valuable input!
Jeff
______________________________________________________________
J E F F F O S T E R
D i g i t a l I m a g i c i a n & P h o t o g r a p h e r
http://www.pixelpainter.com
A u t h o r: "Photoshop Web Magic" series (New Riders Pub.)
http://www.photoshopwebmagic.com
______________________________________________________________
> great point,
>
> voted for stitching, but i'd prefer to be able to get a quality (yet
> affordable) 360 degree panorama camera.
>
>> From: pshute@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Reply-To: panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:33:36 +1100
>> To: panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: How do you make a panorama Photo?
>
>> I notice that stitching is clearly beating one shot 360 degrees. I
>> wonder what the result would be if there was an option "stitching, but
>> I'd prefer to use one shot 360 degrees if I could"?
>>
>> Peter Shute
>
|