Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Justifying a stereograph?
- From: P3D Josh Rubin <jnr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Justifying a stereograph?
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 12:59:03 -0500 (EST)
William Carter writes:
> Ok. Ok. Ok. What is or is not an appropriate subject for a stereographic
> study has gotten some band width lately. Quite eloquently too, I might
> add. But, there's one thing I still don't get. How is it that there is
> ANY onus befalling the poor stereographer to justify one subject as
> "art", but not another? It just dosen't make any sense to me. I think
Seems that the most sensible rule, which allows all to
observe their own sensibilities and to respect others',
is informed consent. That is, totally avoid
unanswerable questions such as "what is art?" and
concentrate on community-building by making sure that
people know what they're going to see and letting them
choose.
Josh
Joshua N. Rubin (jnr@xxxxxxxxx)
------------------------------
|