Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Mounting
- From: P3D Gregory J. Wageman <gjw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Mounting
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 12:50:26 -0700
Tim Stabler wrote:
>>...I purchased the Jasper bar and did some 35mm stereo work last week
>>and the pictures really turned out nice. Or should I say
>>"wonderful"(?). My question is simply what is the easiest way to
>>mount them in Realist mounts? Dr T suggested to me to use RBT mounts
>>but then wouldn't I have to do some masking with tape or something?
Vince M replied:
>I just bought my first package of RBT mounts, and have to say I'm spoiled
>for them... Both types of mounts are available in 4-p, 5-p and 7-p widths;
>and the RBTs are (I think) available in wide and full-frame width, so you
>have lots of latitude (or would this be longitude?)
I presume Tim used parallel lenses, and is concerned about the resulting
areas on each chip which have no homologues on the other. In that case,
a small amount of masking will be required, which as Vince points out can
be done by the choice of mount. Even the window of an RBT "Full-frame"
mount is only 33mm wide, to give some latitude for window adjustment of
a 36mm-wide chip. I would think that the 7-perf mount should give adequate
masking.
I use a variety of mount widths on my full-frame images. The additional
flexability of being able to crop an image at mount time is wonderful. In
some cases I have been able to save an otherwise-ruined image by mounting
in a Realist (5-p) mount, when a head or otherwise-unwanted object managed
to sneak into frame and cause a window violation without my noticing at the
time. You can also center a subject in a 5-p mount which wasn't originally
centered on the 8-p chip. When going to this extreme, some trimming of the
film chip may be necessary (but desirable).
-Greg W.
------------------------------
|