P3D XXX DDD

["ron labbe" <ron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ron Fredrickson writes:
>Can you define XXX for me so that we can all agree on its
>meaning?

We're all not going to agree on anything- but without getting graphic, how
about defining as pornographic that which denegrates sexuality, rather than
uplifts it?

Or, how about graphic sexuality that you'd rather your children not see?

We have to draw the line somewhere, don't we? What are laws but censorship
of our freedoms? If you don't believe in censorship, you don't believe in
laws. Even though we can't ALL agree on our laws, we must make laws- or live
in anarchy. (Which would be OK, if this were utopia!)

This thread relates to 3D inasmuch as stereonudes are a large part of
stereo's history. Erotic photogaphy can denegrate or celebrate human
sexuality. Some things cannot be exactly defined- but to me: if it stirs
carnal arousal, it's pornographic... if it's inspires awe of human beauty,
it's art.



ron


ron labbe/studio3D
30 glendale st maynard, ma 01754
978 897-4221 fon/fax
mailto:ron@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.studio3d.com


------------------------------