Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: Interaxial vs. Interocular
- From: Tom Deering <tmd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: Interaxial vs. Interocular
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 06:06:52 -0400 (EDT)
>You know, I'm sorry I brought the whole thing up. This is what I get for
>being anal retentive. Well, somebody's got to do it, now that Phil Hartman
>is gone... {:-(
>
>Look, let's just drop the pseudoscientific pretense and call these things
>"eye spacing" or "lens spacing" or whatever else seems clear. Shoot, I'll
>even let "interocular" pass; nobody but me seems to mind, I've only
>confused the issue. We can leave the sainthood to the angels above.
Well, I think it was an impoartant distinction, and I don't mind that you
use the correct term.
I must say that understanding what happens when the eye spacing is greater
than the lens spacing was a major leap in my understanding of how stereo
works.
Tom
------------------------------
|