Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Overexposed
- From: George L Smyth <GLSmyth@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Overexposed
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 06:37:17 -0400
Glave Pier Paolo wrote:
>
> I finally shot and developed my first IR film (a Kodak HIE), but with great
> disappointment I obtained very dense, overexposed negatives.
> I don't think that any of the negatives will result in acceptable prints,
> except for 3 or 4 of them, which are, surprisingly enough, rich in the shadows.
>
> Can anyone of you Sherlock Holmes of IR tell me what could be wrong?
>
> These are my data:
>
> - Camera: Ricoh KR-10M with Sigma 28-70 and red filter.
>
> - Exposition: I tried to expose the film for 50 ASA; as my camera sets on 100
> by default (without a DX code), I set a +1 compensation.
>
> - Development: T-MAX 1+4 - 25 degrees (C) - 9 minutes (the table I had gave me
> 7 minutes; I added 2 min. because it was the 5th time I used that T-MAX
> solution) - agitation 5s every 60s.
>
> I received two phone calls during the developing session: could this be the
> problem :-) ?!!!
It sounds like the film was simply overexposed and overdeveloped.
Assuming you were metering through the filter, I would try shooting at
EI 250. I don't use TMax developer, but I would think that you would
want to cut back on the development a bit.
Cheers -
george
- --
Handmade Photographic Images
http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
------------------------------
|