Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Answers to several EIR questions
- From: "Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Answers to several EIR questions
- Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 21:10:54 +0100
On 24 Sep 99 at 18:29, Rolland Elliott wrote:
> EIR does NOT have an antihalation layer. To experience this for
> your self, load the film in fairly bright light (say in partial
> shade around noontime on a sunny day) rate your film at ISO=640,
> meter through a #12 yellow filter, and E-6 push process the film two
> stops. You'll get nice red bands through the first 8 or 10 frames,
> exactly like the bands of density you get when you load HIE in
> light.
I even noticed them with normal exposure & development....Kodak does
have a point here....
Btw, what are the pictorial consequences of underexposing & push
developing?
Have you also tried overexposure and pull developing?
> Kodak says to load color IR film (EIR) in total darkness because
> they want to protect the consumer against any possible fogging.
> This is a reasonable precaution, but unecessary for the many people
> who rate it at around ISO=250 and develope it in E-6 chemicals.
> Unfortunately Kodak takes the same stance about 120 and 220 format
> IR films. They claim they can't manufacture 120/220 IR films
> because IR light fogs the film from the edges. They are right, but
> it is not noticible under most circumstances. And if you can't
> notice it, it doesn't really matter.
Didn't someone once posted a Kodak argument that 120/220 couldn't be
cut with the same machines as for other films, because it relied on
IR-detection? This sounded much more plausible than any
user-argument.
You don't want a separate production/cutting solution for 120/220, as
that would make it way too expensive....any HIE/EIR can only survive
on the market when it uses the same core production facilities as
other films....
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|