Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[MF3D.FORUM:929] Re: Stereo Hassys (was Re: Deviation, etc.)
- From: "don lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:929] Re: Stereo Hassys (was Re: Deviation, etc.)
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 15:54:39 -0700
>From my experience for the 50mm lens the rule should be about 45:1 and 80
for the 90mm lens if this is of any help.What ever works , I wish you luck.
I get the impression that I should shuy up and crawl back into my hole Which
I just might do Best of luck. Don.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Johnson - GCSPHOTO" <GCSPHOTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2000 10:08 AM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:908] Re: Stereo Hassys (was Re: Deviation, etc.)
> Don wrote:
>
> > Like I said before Sports Illustrated could not use the Hasse 3d shots
as
> > they were too Hyper for obvious reasons. Don.
>
> I have no idea what the situation happened to be with the SI
> Hasselblad set-up.
> However, with a base of about 90mm I should have no problems shooting
> subjects
> that are about 10 feet away or more.... I'm not talking 'close-ups' here.
> I'm sure
> that if I then go to 50mm lenses (from the standard 80mm) that I will be
> able to
> get closer. I expect very fine results as long as the generally accepted
> 1:30 rule
> is observed. Most of what I plan to do is landscape related anyway. I
hope
> to
> receive my second Hassy in a couple weeks and then I'll be able to shoot
> MF3D stereos... I'll be sure to send one to you if you would like when
the
> time
> comes.
>
> -Cheers, STUART JOHNSON
>
|