Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Konica IR ...!st time, hyperfocal focusing, and Stigmata
- From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <tracez@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Konica IR ...!st time, hyperfocal focusing, and Stigmata
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 08:44:08 -0700
Thank you, Clive; I now get it! I think I must have assumed that
diffraction gets worse the closer you get to wide open, which is the
opposite of the truth. I have always assumed the smaller the aperture
(larger f-no.) the better the image, really. And, maybe I'm the only one,
but I continually throughout my photographic education (graduating in May)
have mixed up stopping down/opening up etc and the backwardsness of the
f-stop numbers. I have no problem intuiting it, just verbalizing it. And,
I seem to always work from the smallest aperture on "down" which is
technically not the correct terminology--you are working from the largest
wide open hole/aperture to the lesser wide open which you call 'stopping
down'. (by this time everyone on the list is wondering what neophyte they
have here). So I will use your rule of thumb of 3 stops 'down' from wide
open and that'll do just fine. BTW I also checked out your website and
it's great.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: Clive Warren <Clive.Warren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Generally you are correct - although some lens designs break the rule and
> are sharpest wide open - the 203mm Kodak Ektar for example. Usually,
> stopping a lens down by two stops is good practice if you want the
sharpest
> possible image across the negative.
> Using large format lenses (eg 4x5), some of these lenses need to be
stopped
> down in order for the image circle to cover the negative.
> Generally, diffraction is worse at smaller apertures, the trade off is
> around two stops down from wide open. Any smaller and diffraction effects
> decrease image sharpness.
> The best aperture for shooting infrared for image sharpness is again
> generally two stops down from wide open. However with infrared film the
> focussing point is different from that using normal film. Stopping down
> further helps to cover any focussing errors with the associated increase
in
> depth of field.
> If you want a rule then stop down three stops from wide open when using
> Infrared Film. However use of the aperture is part of creative photography
> and although you should avoid very small apertures, feel free to
experiment
> and explore in the same way as you would with visible light photography.
> Throw the rules out of the window and delight in the freedom :-)
> All the best,
Clive http://www.cocam.co.uk
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
- References:
- Re: Konica IR ...!st time
- Re: Konica IR ...!st time, hyperfocal focusing, and Stigmata
- From: Christina Z. Anderson
- Re: Konica IR ...!st time, hyperfocal focusing, and Stigmata
- Re: Konica IR ...!st time, hyperfocal focusing, and Stigmata
- From: Christina Z. Anderson
- Re: Konica IR ...!st time, hyperfocal focusing, and Stigmata
- Re: Konica IR ...!st time, hyperfocal focusing, and Stigmata
- Re: Konica IR ...!st time, hyperfocal focusing, and Stigmata
|